Abstract:
The application of sex allocation theory can provide useful insight into endangered rhinoceros biology to improve in situ and ex situ conservation efforts by understanding the factors that cause a female to produce one sex of calf. By decreasing the birth sex ratio (number of males born per number of females born) in a population it may be possible to increase population growth rates. The first aim was to determine if an environmentally cued sex allocation response occurred in black rhinos. By examining rainfall and calf sex records in a wild black rhino population, I identified that birth sex ratios increase in rainy seasons and rainy years. Mothers were more likely to be observed with male calves if they conceived during the wet season (57.3% male) than during the dry season (42.9% male). Mothers were more likely to raise male calves if they conceived during wet years (60.2% male) than during dry years (46.1% male). Next, I examined whether pulsatile or random variation in sex ratios of different magnitudes, as might occur under changes in climate patterns, would be detrimental to rhinoceros population growth. Results demonstrated that while random increases in the magnitude of birth sex ratio variation, in either direction, increased population survival probability up to 0.907, sequential pulsed years of birth sex ratio bias had the opposite effect on population performance down to a survival probability of 0.619. Furthermore, for both scenarios, populations of less than 50 animals are particularly vulnerable to extinction. Since the sex biases observed in the captive rhinoceros population were attributed to several factors, I used an information theoretic approach to evaluate the relative importance of different hypotheses for birth sex bias for predicting calf sex. The results demonstrated that none of the models tested were greatly predictive of calf sex. Suspecting that the mechanisms that were cueing calf sex occur close to the time of conception and were nutritionally cued, in the final experiment, I measured changes in blood glucose in white rhinos after they ate different meals. At 90 minutes, serum glucose levels in rhinos eating the 10 % lucerne hay diet were significantly lower than the 5% glucose and 10% glucose diets but not the 10% pellet nor 10% grass hay diets. This is the first time such an experiment has been published in a wildlife species and not only demonstrates the feasibility of training rhinos for successive blood draws but also that captive diets are low glycemic for white rhinos. Overall, my research confirmed that an environmentally cued sex allocation response does occur in African rhinos, and changes in the duration and magnitude of sex ratio patterns can decrease population growth and increase potential for extinction. Additionally, none of the previous hypotheses for the suspected male-sex bias in captive born rhinos were influential on calf sex, which shifts the focus of sex allocation research in rhinos to more acute signals around the time of conception, such as changes in diet and body condition.
