DSpace Repository

Independent Review of the Performance Improvement Framework

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Allen, Barbara
dc.contributor.author Berman, Evan
dc.contributor.author Cantal, Clara
dc.contributor.author Eppel, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author Jackson, Brad
dc.contributor.author Löfgren, Karl
dc.contributor.author Macaulay, Michael
dc.contributor.author Phillips, Barb
dc.contributor.author Plimmer, Geoff
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-30T02:02:19Z
dc.date.accessioned 2022-07-11T21:35:33Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-30T02:02:19Z
dc.date.available 2022-07-11T21:35:33Z
dc.date.copyright 2017
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.uri https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/20284
dc.description.abstract The research was commissioned by State Services Commission and constitutes the first independent assessment of the Performance Improvement Framework (PIF). The project brief was to produce three key sets of information: - Comparative research with similar interventions across international jurisdictions; - An assessment of the value and impact derived from the PIF, and; - Recommendations for the future development and application of the PIF. Conclusions The PIF is, on balance, a successful and credible performance improvement tool that has contributed to the development of organisational strategic thinking within organisations. The longevity of the PIF is potentially down to the stability of political support offered by successive governments (unlike, for example, in the UK). Adaptations and evolution of the PIF also contributes to its longevity. Attention needs to be paid, therefore, to continuing evolution; particularly succession planning for personnel such as lead reviewers who have a trusted position and very positive reputation. PIF is one of many review processes and therefore attention needs to be paid to situating PIF within these broader themes; and also to investigate ways in which they can enhance the overall ‘ecosystem’ rather than replicate or challenge or elements of it. en_NZ
dc.format pdf en_NZ
dc.language.iso en_NZ
dc.publisher Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
dc.subject Administrative agencies-New Zealand-Evaluation en_NZ
dc.subject Executive departments-New Zealand-Evaluation en_NZ
dc.subject Performance Measurement. en_NZ
dc.subject Organizational effectiveness-Measurement en_NZ
dc.subject Performance-Management en_NZ
dc.title Independent Review of the Performance Improvement Framework en_NZ
dc.type Text en_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unit School of Government en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor 160608 New Zealand Government and Politics en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.marsden 160509 Public Administration en_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuw Report for external body - PBRF en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcforV2 440809 New Zealand Government and Politics en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account