dc.contributor.author |
Keef, Stephen P |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Khaled, Mohammed S |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Roush, Melvin L |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-12-20T20:26:18Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-12-20T20:26:18Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2011 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10063/1995 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Miller (2009a) presents an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital WACC model. The paper attracts debate which uses a variety of repayment schedules to support the arguments raised. We present an extension of Miller's (2009a) WACC model in a world where interest is tax deductible and debt principal is paid at maturity. We also present the corresponding model for the required rate of return on levered equity which is a vital input to
the WACC model. Since these models are unwieldy, we explore an alternative definition of
the WACC. These models provide insights into the debate on Miller's (2009a) paper. |
en_NZ |
dc.language.iso |
en_NZ |
|
dc.subject |
WACC |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Finite life |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Discount rate |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Tax shield |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
APV JEL: G31, G32 |
en_NZ |
dc.title |
Miller's (2009) WACC model: An extension |
en_NZ |
dc.type |
Text |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.unit |
School of Economics and Finance |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.marsden |
149999 Economics not elsewhere classified |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.type.vuw |
Working or Occasional Paper |
en_NZ |
dc.rights.rightsholder |
www.vuw.ac.nz/sef |
en_NZ |