A grounded theory of the architectonics of library spaces

Abstract

Research problem: The library, as an architectural typology, is reportedly under threat. There is no question the library space needs to evolve to remain relevant in the twenty-first century. This project seeks to reveal patterns of library design and architectonic principles that will shape future spaces. In an age of distraction and rapid change it may not be enough to assume the traditional role of the library, as a ‘temple of knowledge’ built for books, to guarantee the future of libraries. This project proposes a philosophical examination of the relevance of library buildings in the twenty-first century.

Methodology: The grounded theory methodology employed enables a close reading of the determinants behind library design: how libraries influence architectonics and vice-versa. The term architectonics speaks to both architectural design and the importance of buildings as metaphorical representations of humanist principles. The project applies Emmanuel Kant’s philosophical interpretation of architectonics as a ‘system of knowledge’. The steps to generating grounded theory involves the categorisation of data, writing self-reflective memos, theoretical sampling, comparative analysis and theoretical sensitivity. The project also utilises naturalistic observations of three Auckland Public Libraries: Devonport, Rānui and Waiheke.

Findings: Each building typology is important and instructive by mapping and reflecting humanist behaviours and endeavours. As things change over time, small details add up to affect the overarching philosophical understanding of architectonics, in this case ‘the library’. Fortunately, libraries do not have to confront the politicisation of technology directly but can maintain an evolutionary path, as a civic space, by using a new architectonic ‘morality’ that is universally inclusive: sustainability through intelligent design.

Implications: Library buildings can reach into the humanist needs of design – the moral, ethical, harmonious, sustainable, communal elements. Becoming a sustainable beacon for communities may be constrained by material resources and budgets and not every library will be able to engage with eco-friendly designs in their entirety. Future studies will need to engage with communities, stakeholders and library users to explore whether a sustainable typology for library buildings is a worthy and achievable objective.